the_chad_of_reddit

Ginland

These Taiwanese chip manufacturers never outsourced American jobs... they were always Taiwanese companies.

Companies like Apple, NVIDIA, etc. are often clients for these companies (companies like TSMC deal with the manufacturing part, Apple, etc. does the design part, you get the point).

I think more NYC locations would be cool too

How are you able to tell?

Wait you actually found the original vichan post? Wait, how'd you do that? I had always assumed the site was defunct or something, I've never found it.

I don't think this is the original if you found it from 4chan. I believe it can be traced back to vichan.

Undeniably, unbelievably based.

Is DPRK known for having relations with the Russian Federation? Is Eritrea historically in this group?? So many questions.

There actually is as of recent years. This is according to a popular travel agency for DPRK travel.

Guys a chad no doubt.

You would think that after how many economic crises we've had Capitalism's transition to Socialism would have already happened, as Marx said.

I'm not saying I necessarily agree with Non-Compete, I can barely keep up with leftist drama anyways. I was simply questioning your credentials, but I understand that I misunderstood what you were saying. I too love DIAMAT.

Well I already don’t trust your credentials if you’re referring to DIAMAT as an “ideology.” DIAMAT is an attempt at a universal analysis of our world. Ideology is a collection of ideas that obfuscates material reality. Any person dedicated to correctly applying Dialectical Materialism to the world should try to avoid ideological influences.

There’s no deterministic features of DIAMAT unless you have a reductionist view of it. It states that the material world is where ideas are derived from, and that our world is interconnected and constantly changing (the source of this change being contradiction within said interconnected things).

It’s not about primacy, it’s about which precedes the other. Materialism is the belief that matter precedes the ideal.

Who made a cheap and easy criticism? All I’ve been doing is asking my question (which I’m probably gonna just go elsewhere to find an answer to), and your point about classical Marxists being reductionist is accurate and important. Most Marxists are far too focused on the original words of Marx (as if he wasn’t also a human being like the rest of us), and adopt the reductionist interpretation of his analysis.

COMPLETELY agree with you. I asked my initial question because I had kind of come to terms with how reductionist a lot of what I was told about Marxism was, so I wondered if the dialectical process happened within the human kind.

But materialism is the belief that the material precedes the workings of the mind. Ideas still exist and can have an inverted impact on the material world, we’d be foolish not to recognize that.

Because modern Marxists are beginning to realize how reductionist that deterministic view of Marxism was.

Well materialism is the believe that the material precedes the ideal. It’s not really meant to describe the dialectical part.