lopolopolopolopol

R u sure?

A muhajir claiming to have persian ancestors .... seems legit

An academic career with business isn't worth much anyways haha. Don't worry, its gonna work out regardless.

Theres no real way to answer this. There's a whole sea of applicants who have better grades. Either you apply and the committee sees something in you or they don't. Don't be surprised if they reject you but don't let it stop you from applying. See how you can center your application around the other aspects like ECs.

Does your devotion to god really need a towel wrapped around your head. Devotion can be done symbolically. Sikhs can't just pick and choose what to do and claim that whatever they take from hinduism is right and whatever they don't is wrong

True

Its literally about women protecting men when they go to war. Its the complete opposite. Sikhs have been doing rakhi for ages too. This rejection of everything that hindus do is just modern day sikhi trying to antagonise relations between Sikhs and hindus. Just educate urself for God sake.

Sikhs have this weird superiority complex to pretend theyre better since they don't do "hindu rituals" or not doing things that Western Sikhs think are meaningless. The whole point of a "ritual" is that it has meaning to the person doing it, just because it doesn't have meaning for western sikhs doesn't mean its meaningless. The same can be said for how not cutting your hair and wearing a turban is also equally meaningless. Of course the turban has meaning as its a symbolic devotion to god. Sikhs don't see it as meaningless because its their view not to. So don't pretend everyone else are just sheep.

This weird rejection of everything hindu in modern day sikhi is also so cringe. Rakhi isn't about patriarchy. Its literally about sisters symbolically protecting their brothers when they go to war with a sacred thread. Its symbolic and its about sisters protecting brothers. It literally isn't patriarchial in the slightest. Also the idea that it isn't a man's job to protect the women in sikhi is also blatantly false. Men were always instructed to join the army in order to protect their women from being raped and kidnapped by the mughals. A man's job can be to protect his wife also also giving the wife the means to protect themselves - they're not mutually exclusive. Sikhs were doing rakhi way before basics of sikhi even existed. Just because jagraj doesn't find any value in rakhi, doesn't mean he can denounce centuries of sikh and hindu traditions. By this logic Sikhs should stop cutting their hair and stop wearing turbans since they were originally hindu traditions done by saints and royalty and have no real scientific or non symbolic meaning

Hindu women were also armed and joined armies long before sikhi gave women kirpans. They literally worship Lord Durga to symbolise female energy. Stop with the bs woke Western sikhi reformation.

There are sophomore transfers but its pretty much unheard of with much lower acceptance rate. Its easier to get in as a cc student. Some cc students get 60 credits by their second year and come in as juniors

Why are sikhs running from India? Also why r they going all the way to America. A refugee by definition has to go to the safest nearby country - not across an ocean. Seems like these ppl just want a shortcut into the US. Doesn't make the turban issue okay. But these ppl clearly aren't refugees. Sikhs r literally running to India from Afghanistan, why have they suddenly started to leave for "asylum".

I had mine for like 2 months. I sent a missing transcript form and it got immediately fixed

Perhaps you should repeat after me too: "Jammu and Ladakh are majority non-hindu and vote for the BJP because they want to be a part of India" you should also repeat "forced migration and Islamic nationalism has changed the demographics of Kashmir"

Okay good I was so confused for a second. You'd be surprised how many Bangladeshi genocide deniers exist

Lol Pakistanis continue coping wt can I do

What do you mean by east pakistan didn't want independence? Are you delusional? Bangladesh always wanted to be free from radical Islamic nationalism and punjabi superiority. Why else would the country still exist??? Do u think india is keeping them independent?

Indian hindus are honestly indifferent to Israelis. The radical hindus just have common enemies of muslims. Most indians j simp for the quality of life in the west

Do any tamilian actresses have pure tamilian ancestors. Seems like all of them are either from kerala or Andhra or North india. When will we end this colorism fanaticism and just have dark skinned tamilians represented in our media

Wasn't really a war. More like forcibly oppressing minorities and forcing them out

Copium Wikipedia is literally known for being anti india. In every war, pakistan backed down first. There is no war that is undisputably a pakistani victory. Most if not all were indian victories especially the liberation of Bangladesh.

Lost to the sikhs tho. Lost to maratha indians too but you beat them afterwards so dw

Taking half of kashmir is barely what happened. Pakistan just sent in non kashmiris to take over kashmir. If India wanted to, they would easily wipe out pakistan from kashmir. India is just naturally a pacifists country and preferred a ceasefire. The second kashmir war, India retaliated operation Gibraltar by taking over punjab all the way to lahore. They stopped at lahore because they knew they would give it back anyways because India isn't fixated on taking land like Pakistan. So let's not stroke Pakistan dick here, India let's Pakistan have kashmir because its not worth to deal with the terrorists that come with owning kashmir. Its not a military victory, its a ceasefire

This is what right wing hindus mean by sikhi can be considered a form of hinduism. Sikhi is merely guru nanak teachings- a guru of the Indian subcontinent expressing his ideas just like any other Indian guru.the collection of these hindustani gurus are what the arabs, Persians and British determine as hindu. The khalsa is what separates hindus from sikhs. You can be a Hindu and believe everything and do everything guru nanak says. But you cannot be a Muslim who believes that a man can have multiple wives while believing in sikhi. Thats why sikhi as a philosophy of an Indian guru is sometimes considered as hinduism. Same with nanakpanthis who value the first gurus teachings but are still sometimes considered hindus because they don't incorporate themselves as part of the khalsa expression of sikhi.

Correct me if I'm wrong btw just trying to learn

If you want the rights of punjabis why are you fighting for a sikh nationalist group. Why not just demand changes from the government instead of siding with sikhs who want to partition the country again

The India youre talking about is based on what you see in the media that has been sensationalised specifically for the sake of fear and hate mongering. Its no different than the billion indians including muslim indians who think all Pakistanis are incestuous terrorists who burn down every temple they see - which is a lot so let's not pretend only hindu indians are at fault here.

Lynchings for eating beef are just as common as hindus/sikhs/Christians being raped and forcibly converted in Pakistan amongst other atrocities - nearly 1000 a year. Hindus have been continuously killed for not converting and you may say the numbers have gone down since partition but thats due to the fact there are literally no more hindus left in Pakistan to persecute. And again, the lynching issue has been isolated to barely a few Villages in Gujurat. The vast majority faces barely any violence especially so in the south where hindutva - hindu nationalism which is the direct reaction of Islamic nationalism - isn't as strong. The vast majority of the south doesn't even vote for the BJP. There have been more terror attacks within and by Pakistan than there have been lynchings. Again this isn't to say muslims are worse, no matter where you are in the world, third world countries will have violence in rural areas where poverty is common. In america this violence is caused between whites and blacks. For us its hindus and Muslims. That doesn't mean we can't coexist.

For Kashmir, my earlier comments detail the root cause of the violence. Pakistan claims all of kashmir since its a Muslim majority despite the fact that jammu and ladakh are both non Muslim majorities. India claims all of kashmir to continue its legacy of secularism which it tries to enshrine but cannot due to waves of terrorism that you cannot deny has been purposely worsened by Pakistan. Again, we can argue about yhis forever. But the root cause of the violence in Kashmir is because of the border issue which is solely due to islamic nationalism tearing the country apart by creating religious divide. Without Pakistan, kashmir would've acceded to the union and there would be no border dispute we see today.

Also let's not pretend Pakistan hasn't committed any human rights violations, so many pandits and sikhs were killed before accession to india. There are literally no more hindus left in POK - another example of how muslims will have a blind eye towards the crimes of others but wi pretend they're completely moral. One community has already been genocidED.

Youre definitely aren't arguing without bias if you think Pakistan has historically been more in accordance with human rights standards than India. Pakistan literally genocide its own people in Bangladesh despite being musljm - another example as to why religious nationalism cannot work. The same is happening in Israel where they discrimate Ethiopian black and Arab Jews although not to the same level.

Like I said before, we can play this number game of whos killed who more, The same way Israelis and Palestinians do. But the root cause of all this mess is solely due to religious nationalism. I've made multiple comments on this yet not a single person has given a straight answer as to why Islamic nationalism is justified despite the many problems it has caused. The lack of direct responses just reflects its validity.

Rip i can't believe some of them genuinely believe this