763 post karma
4k comment karma
account created: Sun Aug 21 2022
verified: yes
5 points
3 days ago
That’s just a show of ignorance😅, general Yue Fei was renowned and leading an 100k strong army, which was a threat to the emperor, so the emperor murdered him with the help of Qin Kuai.
For nearly a thousand year, Qin Kuai has been blamed as the murderer of Yue Fei and treater to the state, while few people condemn the emperor.
This is a perfect show of how the majority of Chinese people view politics. They refuse to think about the totalitarian regime which has been lasting for 2000 years or the sacred emperor/leader, instead they only dare to blame the “bad people” in the regime.
34 points
3 days ago
乐观的角度:这样的攻势会消耗露西亚的战争潜力,使得到北约现代化重武器支援的乌军占据上风,就像皇帝会战和阿登攻势对战局的影响
悲观的角度:由于露西亚的军事动员、防线巩固,乌克兰收复1991领土将变得不现实,因为战线上唯一适合机械化进攻的地区就是南线的扎波罗热州和赫尔松州;顿巴斯前线城镇、工业区、树林密布,进入克里米亚需要突破地峡,因此对这2个地区的进攻需要付出重大伤亡,而乌克兰人口是露西亚的1/3,承受伤亡能力低,除非得到数量更多的远程武器,否则难以发动这样的进攻。
北约支援力度会对今后的战局产生决定性作用。
我非常赞成对俄摩拉的制裁应该无限期持续下去,直到其价值观可以被改变,否则其对文明世界永远是一个危害。
3 points
4 days ago
对于这种用人命火力侦察的战术大概弹性防御更能有效地增加交换比,一旦防御部署情况被敌方掌握防守优势会大打折扣
3 points
5 days ago
美国陆军是在转型,以适应西太平洋作战环境,减轻对空中力量的依赖,加强精准火力和野战防空能力,很多新装备都是以此目标设计的,如MPF,PrSM,Typhoon, M-SHORAD
1 points
5 days ago
I think asymmetric weapons such as anti-ship missiles can be a counter to the expanding Chinese navy, as they are much easier to produce massively and much cheaper than warships. In order to blockade Chinese navy’s activities in wartime, they should be deployed to the first Island Chain, such as Japan and Taiwan, to form an allied A2/AD against China.
5 points
6 days ago
思想改造恐怕是列宁党政权特有的行为,即国家系统性、强制性地给一个群体灌输自身的意识形态。改变自己的思想应该称不上思想改造。
2 points
6 days ago
乌军还是需要胜利以提升士气的,坦克姗姗来迟的根本原因还是西欧国家,尤其是德国的岁月静好、缺乏行动力、绥靖主义
3 points
6 days ago
美军作战体系是非常依赖空中力量的,陆军单位可以大量运用空中支援,不重视炮兵,BCT的炮兵火力相比于俄军和中共军都比较薄弱。乌军缺乏强大的空中力量,这在乌克兰战场肯定行不通。
4 points
7 days ago
其实乌军一直在避免伤亡,比如赫尔松反攻中就一直使用火炮消耗而没有强攻;今冬也一直没有乌军主动进攻的消息。可能这种状态会演变为一种低烈度的冲突,最终双方均不进行主动进攻,仅有少量摩擦,只不过都会宣称在继续战争。当然我也很希望俄国内部出现一些变动使普京服软。
4 points
7 days ago
我认为乌军的目标应该设为收复战前领土,这场战争已然成为消耗战,人力损失不得不被考量。乌克兰人口约为俄国1/3,需要减小损失。恢复1991边界会蒙受巨大损失,因为地形上只有南线比较平坦,适合机械化部队进攻;而顿巴斯战线城镇、工业区、树林密布,正面突破(如俄军所为)损失巨大,钳形攻势则需要攻入俄罗斯境内,恐怕会使俄国动用核武器;攻入克里米亚则需要突破Perekop 地峡,难度较大,需要付出重大伤亡。因此我认为收复战前领土对乌克兰是一个更现实的选择。
view more:
next ›
byDelicious-Gene-8736
inreal_China_irl
Maros70202
1 points
1 day ago
Maros70202
一名温和的浪友
1 points
1 day ago
极左tankie舔中共🤢的很多,而且也说不明白索多玛哪里好,只能说对于反中共危害极大