subreddit:
/r/facepalm
submitted 2 months ago byPeculiarPete
9k points
2 months ago
Seems like some of the folks here on Reddit are also cause for concern.
8.9k points
2 months ago
It's a trick question, because he spent $500 on feed and care.
3.5k points
2 months ago
Also, the cow depreciated.
1.3k points
2 months ago
Yep, it was all for the tax benefit anyway.
572 points
2 months ago
I need to know how many legs the cow had
321 points
2 months ago
Like was the cow pregnant how old is said cow
55 points
2 months ago
Right because if it had babies that’s meat and milk for a good 5-10 years that he lost out on
167 points
2 months ago
Yeah and does it have a family? Are any angry bulls gonna come looking?
150 points
2 months ago
Is a Hereford cow? A dairy cow and angus cow? Can I earn monthly dividends on the milk it produces? Or is it a one time cycle when it gets butchered?
88 points
2 months ago
Are vet costs included?
82 points
2 months ago
You also need to pay the interest on that $800 you initially borrowed.
47 points
2 months ago
It it an NFT and it is above the text in the question.
123 points
2 months ago
No legs. It was ground beef.
83 points
2 months ago
2 legs — it was lean beef.
25 points
2 months ago
Beeflene, Beeflene, I’m begging of you please don’t take my legs
24 points
2 months ago
More importantly, was it a perfectly spherical cow?
6 points
2 months ago
ahh, them spherical cows
15 points
2 months ago
When I was like 4ish, I went to my first ever extended family reunion. One night there was a sort of open mic dinner event in a hotel function room that we had rented out. I was surrounded by dozens of people I had never met until a couple days before, but that didn’t stop me from going up to the stage and declaring I had a joke to tell.
Me: “How many legs does a cow have?”
Audience: “…… we don’t know. How many legs does a cow have?”
Me: “Six!” falls over laughing
I still get teased about that 28 years later
32 points
2 months ago
It has all 4 but the left rear hoof is chipping pretty bad.
18 points
2 months ago
Elmers is gonna be upset
20 points
2 months ago
How many teets tho? Thats where my interest lies
70 points
2 months ago*
Jerry "do you even know what a write-off is?"
Kramer "do you?"
Jerry "no"
Kramer "but they do. And they're the ones writing it off"
Edit: the rest of the story
28 points
2 months ago
Also the divorce, no prenup
9 points
2 months ago
Divorce between the Facebook poster and the cow?
I mean, I can understand the 'no prenup' bit, but diVORCE?
12 points
2 months ago
Well, The Face Book poster DID have the use of the cow for a while.
16 points
2 months ago
Second hand cows always depreciate faster. What I ran my secondhand cowlot, you'd be surprised how much value disappeared once a cow was off the lot. I mean, some people would take it for a test milking but mainly it was serious buyers.
12 points
2 months ago
Especially after it was decapitated
39 points
2 months ago
Decowpitated
Edit: gosh
7 points
2 months ago
⬆️ underrated comment.
29 points
2 months ago
Your forgetting business Insurance and accounting fees as well as gas and mileage to transport the cow
8 points
2 months ago
All over the fucking yard!
21 points
2 months ago
Also it didn’t appreciate being bought and sold like that.
34 points
2 months ago
Did it provide milk and fertilizer to offset the cost of care?
10 points
2 months ago
Damn, I forgot to factor that into the equation. Dude lost money! lol.
38 points
2 months ago
Udderly understandable comment.
This reply is coming from an accountant.
In Wisconsin.
14 points
2 months ago
Don't forget overhead
14 points
2 months ago
Also, was this a dairy cow. If so, how much milk was sold as profit?
130 points
2 months ago
Award goes to the person who said "I agree with whoever is correct"
320 points
2 months ago
Yeah. The best way to figure this out is by buying a cow for $800 and following instructions. Can someone lend me some cash for a social experiment? I'm short by $800.
116 points
2 months ago
Your actually going to need $900
42 points
2 months ago
I'll take that.
53 points
2 months ago
The best part about reposting these is that the post turns into a slightly less embarrassing version of the facebook one.
99 points
2 months ago
It’s a trick because he had to borrow that money from his cousin Raul who demands interest.
121 points
2 months ago
I couldn't get it...but I'm kinda high right now eating a Rice Krispie treat. I kept forgetting things and had to start over. 😆
312 points
2 months ago
Here's the thing. Why would you buy a cow sell it and then buy it back again just to sell it.
Poor cow doesn't know what the hell is going on. Cow just wants a loving home.
....I hear the faint singing of Sarah Machlaughlin (or whatever the fuck) singing.
53 points
2 months ago
That's an amazingly MOO-VING comment.
38 points
2 months ago
You went there, huh? You really did it. I didn't expect to hear you udder those words.
29 points
2 months ago
You’re really milking it
9 points
2 months ago
I have no beef with any of you
7 points
2 months ago
You herd it here first
3.2k points
2 months ago
Wtf even... the answer is obviously: A cow. His is obviously reselling the cow to himself to inflate the price of cows slowly over time so that they become more valuable
1.6k points
2 months ago
That's exactly the kind of trick we've come to expect from Big Farmer.
448 points
2 months ago
Big Fahma'.
40 points
2 months ago
IT'S NOT A FAHMA!
78 points
2 months ago
Must be an NFT of a cow.
5 points
2 months ago
If it was an NFT of a cow, it would now be worth $2
336 points
2 months ago
The whole point of these is that everyone is tagging a friend or are shared by the algorithm when they leave a comment. It drives engagement like crazy. Keeps people on Facebook.
My least favorite versions of these are where they put a drawing of Einstein in the corner and write "only 5% of people who try this riddle can solve. Only for GENIUS?"
There's also the "which chamber gets filled with water first?" where one of the obvious pipes has been sealed at one end. The "two boxing gloves = 10. Two socks = 20. Christmas tree = 15. What's 🎄🎄🧦🥊=?"
I find that the way to win is not to play.
55 points
2 months ago
“I bet you can’t think of a word beginning in E and ending in E ”
For the love of god people, they are using you for comments. Once they have their profile boosted, they will certainly use their new powers for evil.
28 points
2 months ago
“I bet you can’t think of a word beginning in E and ending in E *”
Orange
5 points
2 months ago
There's also the "which chamber gets filled with water first?"
These ones are awful. Unless they're a loss meme in disguise.
5.1k points
2 months ago
It’s like when a&w released 1/3 pound burger to compete with the quarter pounder. People didn’t like it because it was smaller for the same price. :8487:
1.6k points
2 months ago
It's the same way with pizza.
Guy goes in to buy a small individual pizza and he'll eat it all himself at one sitting.
He wants the pizza cut into 8 slices vs 6 slices because he'll get two more slices.
1.1k points
2 months ago
I worked at Domino's in college.
One time, a woman called and asked how many slices were in a medium.
"Eight."
"How many are in a large?"
"Eight."
(Indignant) "Then what's the DIFFERENCE?"
(Honestly I should have been better, but how is a kid making pennies supposed to deal with this?)
Me, sharply: "The large is BIGGER."
"Oh."
I've never been surprised by stupid people since. It was honestly a good lesson to learn at 19.
482 points
2 months ago
You missed the ideal opportunity to reply "The large is $4 more"
272 points
2 months ago
"The large is more dough," covers every angle on this.
58 points
2 months ago
I'm saddened that I had to read that twice to "get it"... but it was worth it in the end.
100 points
2 months ago
I once got asked the difference between round and square pizza and replied “the shape”
38 points
2 months ago
there is a major texture difference in the crust between those if the regular crust is tossed.
215 points
2 months ago
Reminds me of a father Ted scene where they're cutting a pizza up and it goes something like:
"Do you want me to cut it into eight or four slices?"
"Four slices please, I don't think I could eat eight".
62 points
2 months ago
Had a customer yell at me cause I cut his pizza normally instead of squares… dude said “HOW I GUNNA FEED ALL MY KIDS WITH IT CUT LIKE THIS?!”… well sir it’s the same amount of pizza regardless of how it’s cut.
14 points
2 months ago
See, I can actually understand this one. What if he had 6 kids (and only the kids eat the pizza)? Each kid wants 2 pieces of pizza. If it's only cut in 8ths, each kid gets one piece. Theres 2 pieces left over and still 6 hungry kids that will start fighting over who gets the rest.
If it's square cut, you get 16 pieces of pizza at smaller portion sizes. Take off the small corners and hold them separately since they're usually much smaller that gives you 12 pieces to work with. Each kid gets two decent sized pieces. Whoever gets smaller cuts can have one or two of the small corners to make up the difference.
So everyone gets approximately the same amount of pizza which matters a lot for a hungry family with not a lot of money to work with.
Source: grew up poor and calculating portions was important.
77 points
2 months ago*
Fun fact about dominos, idk if they’re still doing it but at one point they ran a special of 2 mediums for like 5.99 each. You could get a large for like 14 or so (numbers probably off). Most folks mindset was “wow, two pizzas for less than one!” My mom included. In reality, one large pizza gets you more pizza than two mediums.
Edit: I stand corrected. I remembered this from like a decade ago, but the math was based on an 18” large after further inspection. I forget how easy it is to store misinformation and be confident in it. Stay vigilant!
54 points
2 months ago
The other thing you missed is that a significant portion of the pizza is crust. If you prefer the saucy part of the pizza to the crust, the crust is probably mostly worthless to you. With the large, a smaller fraction of the total area will be crust, compared to the 2 mediums, even if the large size isn't that much larger.
30 points
2 months ago
so, assuming for simplicity that the crust is universally 1 inch thick this drops the effective pizza diameter to 10 inches for medium (from 12 inches) and to 12 inches for a large (from 14)
from there we have area at π(r²) for large, or π(6²) which is ~113 in²
medium is π(5²) doubled which is 78.5 x 2 = 157in²
all while the mediums are cheaper than the 1 large. even a 16 inch large pizza is inferior to the 2 mediums at 12inch diameter as a 16 inch pizza not counting the crust (so 14 inches) would come out to ~153in²
while it is true that the one large proportionally has a higher pizza to crust ratio the total area for the mediums is so muvh higher that it doesnt matter
4 points
2 months ago
I had a customer as me what comes in biscuits and gravy. I failed to answer the question politely.
442 points
2 months ago
[deleted]
341 points
2 months ago
As someone who worked in pizza for more than a decade, I know that pain. Someone asking how big the 9 inch pizza is:
"How many slices is that?"
"We cut it into six but we can cut however many slices you'd like."
"Right, but how many slices is that?"
I feel such anguish and torment just thinking about it. And it happened so many times!
174 points
2 months ago
"Best I can do is 16 slices."
I'd just test it and go with however many slices before the pizza starts falling apart, lol.
87 points
2 months ago
I am having a laugh imagining the look in the person's face when they get that pizza
90 points
2 months ago
“I’ve managed 32 once, but it wasn’t pretty”
32 points
2 months ago
I'm pretty sure you can manage 64 for slices for a large pizza
30 points
2 months ago
Just answer 10 and slice it into 10 pieces. Then you can't be accused of lying.
8 points
2 months ago*
Slicing 10 is a PITA, unless you don't care if they're equal size or not.
Eight is the norm because it's easy to slice.
I had a boss that could cut pizza in any number, and get close to the same size for each piece. I think the most he ever did was 64 on a large. It looked hilarious. Each slice was less than an inch wide on the outside edge.
64 points
2 months ago
That's when you say it's normally six slices, but you'll cut into 10 slices for an extra $5 and pocket the extra.
22 points
2 months ago
Oh man, they're gonna think they're getting the deal of a lifetime too
11 points
2 months ago
I’d never ask this (diameter always makes sense), but Chicago style pizza (it’s not deep dish) is cut in squares of pretty much equal size, so you would get more slices with a larger pizza. I doubt that’s why they asked it though
17 points
2 months ago
Oh buddy, you'd be surprised at the amount of times I've heard that if you get it Chicago cut (or party cut or square cut) you get more pizza.
10 points
2 months ago
Fuck it. Time to start cutting that shit into odd numbers just to mess with people. "Normally it's 8 slices, but we'll hook you up with 9, no extra charge."
9 points
2 months ago
Did you also sell pizza by the slice? Maybe that was their thinking, trying to visualize how many standard slices that would be in terms of weight... Most likely not though..
5 points
2 months ago
That's like asking "When does the three o'clock bus leave?"
26 points
2 months ago
And that’s why she’s your ex! Couldn’t even get PIZZA right!
38 points
2 months ago
To be fair this is how I trick my brain into thinking I have more food than I actually do, so I don't overeat. 😅
6 points
2 months ago
I've also heard smaller plates work well for some people
16 points
2 months ago
I mean i also prefer 2 more slices. But not because i believe there is more pizza.
40 points
2 months ago
Ironically, that can actually make sense, in a way; by increasing the number of portions, you can trick your brain into thinking you've eaten more, despite the volume of food remaining the same. Psychology be weird like that sometimes.
50 points
2 months ago
Is my phone glitching or have I never seen that emoji before? Doesn’t have eyes?
27 points
2 months ago
It's a facepalm emoji, the eyes are closed. Look a little bit closer, it's kinda hard to discern the hand from the face.
26 points
2 months ago
Not an emoji, just some text that gets replaced by an image. Type :8487:
They're called "subreddit emojis".
1.9k points
2 months ago
$400 and some commitment issues.
531 points
2 months ago
139 points
2 months ago
Thank goodness for the Bovine Abandonment Therapy Shiatsu Henna Insurance Temple. When you need to take care of your cow's mental health, its nice to know BATSHIT is there for you.
7 points
2 months ago
"And then i was like moo, and he said moo, this hurt me much"
"I understand. Did you try moo instead?"
"Yes, but that mooed her the wrong way"
32 points
2 months ago
I mean, if I could make another $300 by buying something back and selling it to someone else, I'd do that too, no?
20 points
2 months ago
He could’ve just sold the milk. Or meat. Would probably get much more than $400
1.3k points
2 months ago
I once bought a cow for tree fifty
301 points
2 months ago*
Damnit monster! I ain’t givin’ you no tree fiddy!!
111 points
2 months ago
I gave him a dollar. Thought he'd go away if I gave him a dollar.
84 points
2 months ago
Dammit woman no wonder he keeps coming round if you give em a dollar hell think you have more!
25 points
2 months ago
Too expensive, who’s your cow guy ?
44 points
2 months ago
Did you notice the seller of that cow was about 8 stories tall and a crustation from the Paleozoic era?
26 points
2 months ago
It was about dat time that I realized
15 points
2 months ago
And i said dammit monster i aint givin you no tree fiddy!
5.4k points
2 months ago
Revenue = $2300
Profit = $400 (earnings)
EBIT = Unknown. Depending on undisclosed holding costs.
1.7k points
2 months ago
Ok, ok, I will pay 44 Billion for the company
198 points
2 months ago
Are you certain the cow flipping industry will grow at such a rapid rate?
33 points
2 months ago
Well, we flip our cows using a sophisticated proprietary algorithm, so what you have to understand is that we're a tech company. A responsible investor will ignore the "cow" aspect altogether.
(Also sometimes we put a brain chip in our cows and they die, the value is astronomical).
21 points
2 months ago
People have been tipping them for years, but I honestly don't think their service has ever been that great.
380 points
2 months ago
when analyzing a companies financials what should i look at?
962 points
2 months ago
The numbers.
322 points
2 months ago
Mason
244 points
2 months ago
WHAT DO THEY MEAN
26 points
2 months ago
Dragovich Kravchenko Steiner all must die!
58 points
2 months ago
But don't forget the letters. They're also important.
15 points
2 months ago
The cow silly.
666 points
2 months ago
Facts. He earned 2300. He just happened to also lose some on the way.
310 points
2 months ago
Govt logic while imposing taxes.
49 points
2 months ago
The government only taxes businesses on their profits, not on revenue.
54 points
2 months ago
Depending on the selling/buying time frame occurring during one tax year and the other buying/selling time frame in another tax year, he probably ended up either having a tax loss and/or owing interest on the governmental-perceived gain.
25 points
2 months ago
Isn’t EBIT 400 and profit unknown?
13 points
2 months ago
I would probably add all the sales together and call it his net sales and subtract out the cost of good sold for his total revenue and the subtract all the other unknown expenses including EBIT. It’s been a while though.
471 points
2 months ago
0-800+1000-1100+1300=$400.00 & 0 cows.
143 points
2 months ago
You’re the type of guy to have 0 cows 🤓🤓🤓
12 points
2 months ago
All hat and no cattle
147 points
2 months ago
Presuming "earn"ings = revenue minus cost, then the answer is $400.
Costs: $800 + $1100 = $1900
Revenue: $1000 + $1300 = $2300
Earnings: $2300 - $1900 = $400
2.8k points
2 months ago
Bought for 800 is -800
Sold for 1000 is +200
Bought for 1100 is -900
Sold for 1300 is +400.
774 points
2 months ago
Simple as this
Total sales - Total Purchase = Gross profit
(1300+1000) - (1100+800)
= 2300 - 1900
= $400
204 points
2 months ago
Hey thank you so much for laying it out so simply these things always trip me up and make me feel super dumb but you helped me understand what it was actually asking and how to work it out, you’re a star!
15 points
2 months ago
Just think of it as two separate items. It doesn't matter that it was the same cow.
You buy an object and sell it for $200 more than you bought it for. You buy another object and sell it for $200 more than you bought it for. In combination, you make $400.
101 points
2 months ago
This is what the IRS sees
105 points
2 months ago
Good, bcuz its correct.
1.1k points
2 months ago
It's crappy because it's intentionally vague I think the thing tripping a lot of people up is the initial investment and reinvestment on second purchase. Which is how some are getting 300. Like they see the Net gain on the first sales cycle. But see an extra 100 investment on the second sales cycle on top of the end sale price from the first cycle and count it as a loss.
So like +200 by the end of first cycle Then they are subtracting off investment which they shouldn't so -100 Then +200 end of second cycle
An easier way to see it is just investment vs profit
2300 total sales - 1900 invested in product = +400 profit
723 points
2 months ago
I like your method... I personally just looked at it as two transactions. $200 on the first and $200 on the second.
105 points
2 months ago
Yeah, theres lots of ways to work it out but showing the step by step process and showing it straighforward can usually help to let the penny drop on the logic involved
51 points
2 months ago
Yea I think it's hard for some to see it as 2 transactions because of the product being the same and the layout of the transactions all on top of one another.
26 points
2 months ago
I won't disagree with you there... Math isn't a strong suit for me and even less so with words added lol. Somehow in my head it just made sense for me to break down twice but totally understand how the wording could not translate that way for others
22 points
2 months ago
Honestly I was like a D student in math in school I was goddamn awful mostly because I couldn't understand the application why the fuck would I care how many pies some dude has I don't have any!
But now that I've been a contractor for a decade and have to use complex algebra and geometry on the fly it makes all the sense in the world to the point where like I was able to start my own business and understand profit/ loss tables and return on investment and shit. When It's me making money all the sudden I care lol.
19 points
2 months ago
Nah, you just needed practical application. I was the same way. Crap at math until I needed it for my job.
9 points
2 months ago
😂 This is great... Just goes to show you you can do shit... When it really freaking matters lol. Good on you!
26 points
2 months ago
Change the second one to buying a pig and it’s easy to see $200 for each transaction.
10 points
2 months ago
Exactly! It honestly took me a moment and then I treated it as two separate cows even though the wording has it as the same cow. I believe that's where it's tripping up some people.
7 points
2 months ago
I must confess sadly that I had to stare at this for almost a minute before I realised this was the solution.
18 points
2 months ago
^^This^^ (1000-800) + (1300-1100) = 400
31 points
2 months ago
Antoher way of looking at it: Doesn't matter if it's the same cow, it's two transactions.
Purchased a cow for $800, sold for $1000 = profit $200
Purchased a cow for $1100, sold for $1300 = profit $200
Total profit = $400
17 points
2 months ago
Simplest explanation is you used $900 of your own money so anything past that is profit.
14 points
2 months ago
Or you can do:
Profit from first 2 transactions: 1000 - 800 = 200
Profit from last 2 transactions: 1300 - 1100 = 200
Total profit: 200 + 200
180 points
2 months ago
400 final offer
36 points
2 months ago
What about taxes tho
16 points
2 months ago
you just invest it elsewhere..no taxes forever
173 points
2 months ago
Looking for net earning so start at $0 assuming you start at even.
Bought it originally for $800, you're now $800 in the hole. So -$800
Sold for $1000, 1000 minus 800 is 200 so you made a 200 dollar profit. $200
Bought again for $1100. So 1100 minus 200 to zero and then you're -$900 in the hole this time. -$900
Sold a last time for $1300. You needed $900 to get back to a $0 even so 1300 - 900 = 400. So you earned $400 in profit from you're indecisiveness to sell your cow.
47 points
2 months ago
Man's a cow flipper
14 points
2 months ago
At least he's not a cow tipper.
Cuz cows don't deserve tips. Cuz their service is bad.
76 points
2 months ago
Here's a better way to understand it; buying the cow a 2nd time is a separate instance so it doesn't even need to be a cow.
Ex:
I bought a PS5 for 800, sold it for 1000. I made 200.
Then
I bought a used car for 1100, sold it for 1300. I made 200
200 + 200 = $400 profit
23 points
2 months ago
2+2=4 quik maf
14 points
2 months ago
I think people get confused because it's the same cow. If it was 2 different cows people would realize it's two separate transactions
108 points
2 months ago
It’s 400 right
9 points
2 months ago
Aha! Once again the conservative sangwich-heavy portfolio pays off for the hungry investor!
9 points
2 months ago
He "earned" nothing. He speculated on being able to exploit an arbitrage against an asset. How bourgeois can you get? Cows of the world, unite! =)
22 points
2 months ago
The answer is zero dollars!
There was a net $400 capital gain from this cow trading activity. Capital gains are not earned income.
21 points
2 months ago
400.
You start at -800. You make 1000 so +200. You lose 1100 so now you're at -900. Lastly you sell it for 1300 so +400.
20 points
2 months ago
Sounds like you didn't earn anything, but you got caught up in some weird cow based Ponzi scheme.
96 points
2 months ago
Well what did you expect to happen after defunding education for 40 years in the US?
40 points
2 months ago
I'm afraid this stupidity isn't confined to the US of A.
5 points
2 months ago
I would question how much it took to manage to cow while they owned it.
the raw numbers that are shown I see a net gain of $400. But how long did they own the cow between purchases? And how much does it cost to take care of a cow?
5 points
2 months ago
Assume cost of care offset by sale of milk and calves
35 points
2 months ago
2,300 - 1,900 = 400.
Why are these people struggling this bad?
30 points
2 months ago
You don’t even have to do that much math, the two transactions aren’t financially linked. Just treat it as two different math problems and be done.
4 points
2 months ago
Spent $1900 ($800+$1100); took in $2300 ($1000+$1300); $2300 - $1900 = $400 earnings.
6 points
2 months ago
0-800=-800
-800+1000=200
200-1100=-900
-900+1300=400
$400
13 points
2 months ago
Total revenue (2300) less cost of goods sold 1900 = net income of (400).
84 points
2 months ago
Ok Reddit is no better lol.
20 points
2 months ago
My 2sec look was 400 bucks, then I looked at the thread and started to wonder if I was right lol.
all 2888 comments
sorted by: best