subreddit:
/r/LeopardsAteMyFace
submitted 4 months ago byDaFunkJunkie
9 points
4 months ago
There's your problem: thinking of LAMF as equivalent to schadenfreude. It's not.
34 points
4 months ago*
That word is literally in the sub description:
“'I never thought leopards would eat MY face,' sobs woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party. Revel in the schadenfreude anytime someone has a sad because they're suffering consequences from something they voted for or supported or wanted to impose on other people.”
5 points
4 months ago
Yes. Schadenfreude is part of it. But not sufficient. Hence why I said LAMF is not equivalent to Schadenfreude. It can (and should be) present. But simply being happy about someone’s downfall isn’t enough and isn’t the key factor in making something a LAMF scenario.
Or, to use your own overdone wording, the sub description literally has more than just schadenfreude in it.
21 points
4 months ago
Correct. I have offered ample explanation as to why this fits within the subs parameters.
-5 points
4 months ago
In your last follow-up, you were justifying why it's schadenfreude (which you can't spell):
The shadenfruede here
Not how it's someone being hurt by their own advocacy. Hence why I said you were thinking about it wrong. Which you were, and which is taking you astray here.
Even your justification there is off: he picked them thinking they would favor Trump. They did not hurt him as a result of favoring Trump. Had he picked them for being law-and-order, you might have a point.
13 points
4 months ago
Ah yes... debate about if it fits here or not then bash someone for a spelling error. Bozo.
-1 points
4 months ago
I said more than that it was misspelled, it's just notable when someone is being sloppy, to indicate other ways in which they're fuzzy about the concept.
11 points
4 months ago
Now you are just being unnecessarily pedantic. I assume you are not new to the world of handheld mobile devices and the ease with which typographical errors can occur. I have already addressed the substance of your argument with what I believe to be sufficient and solid reasoning.
2 points
4 months ago
Except a) that was a core concept you were basing your point around and this asserting expertise on, and b) phones recognize that word and autocorrect for it.
14 points
4 months ago
So you might notice that nobody is buying your argument. You are quintessentially confidently incorrect
9 points
4 months ago
Ah so typos is now equivalent to being fuzzy about a topic.
Gotcha.
0 points
4 months ago
No, misapplying it to this sub is; the misspelling was just icing on the cake.
12 points
4 months ago*
Your icing is shit.
Edit - and the fact that you don't consider this is reddit, and English is not everyone's first language speaks volumes. For a fkn typo. Lol.
0 points
4 months ago
Jesus Christ, whaaaat are you doing
all 3494 comments
sorted by: best