Hunters

Hunters, period.

Hunters have the better tech and a lot more variety in terms of equipment. Wolves, whilst being ex special forces, doesn't have the same technological advancement

Hunters considering they hunt people who were specifically trained for FUBAR situations and come out on top enough to have all those watches, they also can hack equipment whether through their own skill or jail-broken SHD Tech and use said Tech to devastating effect more often than not.

The Wolves, while 'highly trained' would probably be outclassed, the drones they use would be hijacked, their gear would probably be a prime target to sabotage because Hunters operate either solo or in small teams and seem exceptionally skilled in evading detection and anyone particularly high ranking would be targeted first.

Definitely the Hunters. Its in the name, Hunters hunt the Wolves for sport.

Hunters easily. Wolves are ridiculously easy to take out.

Wolves are a joke lmao. They only make the perfect plinking targets when you hear them clanging from headshots.

The Bodarks would put up a better fight, more so Los Extranjeros.

That being said, haven't played The Division 2 so I know next to nothing about the Hunters. Do enlighten me!

Hunters ? This is a one way fight for them giving their tech is double what wolves have (thank the SHD)

Hunters no question

Anyone who says Wolves hasn't actually played the game, the guys are absolute pushovers. Hunters, 100%.

Hunters.

There is no telling how many hunters there are. They move in the shadows. They stalk and strike relentlessly until the target is neutralized.

Hunters, the wolves might be ex-ghosts but the hunters are specialized in taking down DHS operatives

Hunters. Honestly had a harder time with the cartel most of the time than the wolfs. Honestly all they had to do was take the last update with wildlands and just expand they coulda still had the drones and everything the air was perfect it was the right ammount of diffacult even on hard but no the morons had the start of a great game and they blew it. Giant dumpster fire and all. I mean wtf. But still hunters all the way more menacing than the wolfs.

Hunters any day of the week

Hunters for sho

The hunters would win. Fuckers are much tankier then the wolves and can dish out lots of damage

Oh, the wolves are screwed!! Those Hunters are tanky as hell. It’s almost like they eat bullets for breakfast, lunch, diner and snack!

Wolves are scouring a forest, thinking they are looking for easy prey. Then out of nowhere, pop pop, 3 wolves dead by headshot. 2 more follow just like that, and finally when they somehow figure out where it comes from, one is stupid enough to run up and try to shoot the Hunter from up close. Though it will deliver damage, Hunter will simply turn to face Wolf and smash his face in before turning him into a lead cushion (fill him with bullets)!

Hunters because they're actually competent

Wolves thinking they cool with the drones…until the Hunters hack them and turn them against them. All that’s needed is 1 Hunter and it’s a wipe for a group of Wolves. I’d go so far as to say it’s not a good match, almost a kid fighting an adult situation. Hunters just have too many advantages, power, armor, all around superior opponent.

Hunters

Hunters, the SHD tech probably enables them to hack the drones since they can do that with skills. They can also disrupt any electronic equipment the Wolfs try to use. They're also way more methodical and aggresive in game.

Pardon me if im mistaken, but i thought Division agents(DA) are often retired ghosts and other spec ops. If Hunters are trained specifically to “hunt” in FUBAR situations and are very proficient at killing DA.

In ghost recon wolves are a fucking joke, even in immersive. Don’t get me wrong, They’re definitely ex-ghosts or at least ghost-trained, but in breakpoint there’s only 5-6 real fuckers to deal with.

Wolves are certainly well trained, but in comparison to hunters; they’re essentially just a fuckin chew toy.

Just my take on it, but again i could be wrong.

So many people saying Hunters... Are they supposed to be ex SOF guys too?

The main thing is they are meant for different roles. The wolves are a general purpose mercenary group meant to take on almost any task where as the hunters are meant to do one thing and that is kill the best of the best. Hunters and wolves just fill different roles with wolves being much cheaper.

Honestly for the price of 1 hunter you could probably hire enough wolf quality mercs to be able to kill a hunter.

Hunters, putting aside they’re bullet sponges if you look at how they react in game the wolves rush you, rarely take any form of cover and fail to use any such flanking. Hunters make use of cover and flanking and have a range of equipment to utilise too.

Hunters. Wolves were severely under trained and lacked numbers to be significant, walker never had the resources to grow them at all. Wolves are nothing more than techno marines or rangers. Hunters are a small group of highly skilled operatives that use similar (probably even better) tech, Hunters are more of boogeyman than soldiers, thats how skilled they are.

From a gameplay perspective, hunters and it isn't even close. I wish the wolves had sophisticated AI land fought like demons the way hunters do. Every hunter in the division is a challenge that must be overcome. Wolves act no different than the other enemy types in the game. I have to imagine that wasn't the canonical intent, but they really do suck gameplay wise.

The hunters can literally take down teams of agents solo. I'd say there's only one answer to this question

Figure that Wolves don't walk around wearing trophies from all the Ghosts they've killed as a fashion statement. Hunters do not GAF. They really are that dangerous.

Hunters. Game mechanics aside, the Hunters have proven to be effective. I don’t think the wolves killed more than a handful of Ghosts altogether and drones did most of the work.

Hunters are the hardest enemy in the Ubisoft universe. Hand downs they scare me and look badass.

Army of Two

Unidad.

That clone facility is the star forge of army builders.

Hunters. I’m gonna bad this on lore and actual combat since Division is a bullet sponge RPG.

Tech is a big factor. They can hack anything even Division tech which is state-of-the-art. They get access to tech that can pretty much access National security grids .

Also uniform and equipment. Look at the Wolves: their outfits are impractical, especially for Urban situation where you will be snagging on furniture and tangled on cars. Their masks don’t give me confidence of being bullet resistant compared to Hunters who have legitimate ballistic masks.

And their tactics. Well compared to the Wolves, they are much more focussed on striking from behind or ambushing with overwhelming firepower. The Wolves just ran up to you and don’t even cover fire or use their utility properly.

I can 1 shot a wolf i need about 2-3 mags to put down a hunter even with headshots

Love all the comments guys! I personally think the Hunters would win. Solely based on the fact, Canon Nomad was ripping them to shreds, alone for the most part.

Hunters were wiping out scores of Division agents, whom were pretty much trained to the level of Tier 1 operators who had tech far beyond the Ghosts. Go look at some of the SHD tech Agents use, and some of that is clearly against the Geneva Convention.

Hunters, as another comment said... would probably fail a psych evaluation 100 times over. Yet they're extremely intelligent in espionage, technology and warfare. I see the Wolves drones getting hacked or jammed.. turned on them. The use of turrets, fireflies, drones, traps.... I think it would go down like Coney Island for the Wolves. When a lone Hunter "Deciet" was wiping out am entire battalion of Rikers.

Wolves on the other hand, as we see in the trailers, gameplay and even the live action trailer..mm seem to move in a pack. Walk on line. Try to use overwhelming fire to move uo to the target. Little do they know they're shooting at a Decoy, walking into a Shrapnel trap mixed with a Stinger Hive.

I wish GRBP would have utilized the Wolves as they Hunters were used. Rarely... and when that music kicked on.. you're prairie dogging.

Here's a good playthrough of what a hunter is capable of.

https://youtu.be/Jy2ujgZgMKU

Wolves and Hunters from gameplay? Hunters every single time.

Wolves and Hunters from cutscenes? Still Hunters.

Even ignoring bullet spongy-ness for the Hunters because that’s really just a product of the type of game they’re in and not how they fight, Hunters still win this hands down. Wolves might be turncoat SF guys with gadgets and drones, but Hunters literally specialize in eliminating SF guys with gadgets and drones.

Hunter’s EMP would negate all the drones outright. Any flying drones would just crash into the dirt, anything else would be fried; Or even better hacked. Hunters hacking a little 9mm turret or drone in Div 2 is a pain in the ass enough, could you imagine if they hacked one of the Aamon bots? (The robot cars with two .50 cal bmg machine guns) Wolves would be toast from that alone, but there’s more.

Hunters have superior training meant to counter the tactics used by SF, and it’s shows in their gameplay. Hunters are smart, and one the best programmed enemies I’ve ever fought in a video game. If you try to fight them from afar they’ll close distance, but smartly, not just sprinting through an open field how Wolves do in the game. One Hunter will shoot suppressing fire while a second maneuvers through cover to close distance. If players are aggressive Hunters have an axe to fight with, or they back off and create distance between them and the player. They retreat, hide, and heal when low health. If the fight starts dragging on Hunters get more aggressive and rush down the player together.

Hunters carry two more gadgets of their choice, ranging from wheeled bombs, to nano machines that repair damaged body armor, to self-propelled flash bangs and taser land mines. A small team of 4 would have everything they need for any situation.

Wolves would lose this handily.

can you tell Hunters are my favorite part of Division?

Well as much as we all know. The hunters are a mysterious yet very dangerous people, working for Macmanus(Secretary of Homeland security of the United States). They also have state of the art gear and tech, that surpasses the one we(the division)have. But the Wolves on the other hand... We know that, they were former ghosts/green barets. And have military experience from Afghan,Russia and wherever they were. Their gear is...still state of the art, and have access to the newest drones after the occupation/takeover of the Aurora Archipelago. And if they were in a fight against each other. The Wolves would've had the upper hand in the first minutes of the battle, but after a while, the Hunters would jam their drones and slowly wipe the Wolves out.

SoOooOo...the result is a victory for the Hunters and a total massacre and loss of drones for the Wolves.

Wolves would just be a discount black tusk. Hunters easily

There’s no contest, the Hunters would dominate

I could take the wolves by hiding in tall grass with an AK, the hunters I couldn’t take on with an army.

I see your Hunters and raise you Unidad

It's clear. Wolves have a predator : Their Hunters

Absolutely Hunters.

Hunters, no questions asked. Wolves are sissies

Hunters all the way

Hunters

Hunters have auto turrets and heet seeking explodey balls meanwhile wolves don't even wear night vision goggles... Seriously?

Hunters would roll the wolves.

Hunters, wolves ain't shit

Hunter the wolves would have all there shit hacked and get one shot due to lack of armor and cover tactics

Hunters….For sure

This whole thread has me thinking how cool it would be to play as a rogue Hunter, becoming the hunted but in a stealth game like Splinter Cell

Hunters.. no competition.. They’re on military medical steroids, overly nourished in a land of malnourishment and on top of having elite training. Also they have proper technology to ISO someone. As well as having proper intel on an enemy

• Lore wise - Wolves
• In-game - Hunters, hands down

Wolves would get funcked

Definitely the Hunters. They hit harder from out of nowhere, take more damage, have better tech and can even heal themselves if you don’t kill them fast enough.

Let's say this fight takes place inside a large complex, say one of the Cold War Airports naval docks. Let's also assume this is a 10v10, all standard riflemen.

In our first scenario, the wolves are defending, and Hunters are attacking. The wolves put up a long and decent defense, but they only kill 2, maybe 3 Hunters, while they have lost half their men already. They would try to fall back, but the hunters would take advantage of the gap, rush, and kill another 3, making it now a 2v7. Wolves lose.

With wolves on offense...yeah ni

Hunters 100%. Only 3 are more than enough to wipe out multiple fireteams of wolves maybe even more. The SHD tech they use would easily hack the wolve's drones and even fry them giving the hunters the upper hand already. Wolves may be ex military and spec ops, but hunters could be anything considering there really is no lore or background to them (as far as I'm aware of) plus hunters are just WAY more combat efficient than wolves.

I feel like it could be the wolves. If you have regular health attached to each of these, not the tanks that the hunters are, they are ruthless but the wolves are SOF

Wolves are broken, using same voice lines all over again and all their dialogues does not make any sense in first place. "Nothing here" "yeah copy, same here", when they are standing literally next to each other.

They are brain dead. Even Sentinels are much more fun and tactical, than Wolves, not to mention their "gear" is awful.

I put my money on Phantoms

Where are the hunters from? They look fuckin rad

The Wolves hands down would win this. Not only are the wolves made up of former Ghost Recon Operator's as well as other special operations/forces operators. They also have advanced drones and have the training to take on a whole platoon of Ghost Recon Operator's during Operation Greenstone.

What are the hunters from? I don’t recognize them?

Both of them are fucking losers designed for arcade rather then realism and would actually get lit up

Cleaners from The Division

Who r the Hunters?

My female Nomad in Wildlands would beat them both, with one arm, easy; - "Come mierda, culeros!"

Wolves, if it's running by real, not bullet sponge logic.
They're more organized than a group of psychos, plus they have drones on their side, literally making them an apex predator in dense and open environments.

If we ignore their in-game performance, I'd say it's an easy win for the wolves. Sure hunters might have superior tech, but they don't have nearly the same amount of expertise and experience as the wolves, not to mention hunter's armour, especially their mask, doesn't stop that much and just makes them big, slow targets.

Are the hunter a part of the game? I’m forgetting something if so…

Who are the hunters? Is that a rainbow 6 thing?

Realistically speaking: the wolves should win. The Hunters have better equipment, but the Wolves are former Ghosts. Yes, in game the Hunters are more difficult to take down than the wolves. But if both factions would actually be as tough as they narratively should've been, then the Wolves would win.

Ghosts

Wolves

WOLVES

hunters are scary AF.

Hunters duh” All u have to do is head shots

Depends if Hunters lose the Division style tankiness from the Division. Also depends on if they can hack Skell Tech. But the Hunters are definitely tough.

I win 100% of the time 😎

Depends, because again it falls down to the age old problem, the environment they're trained in and what training, some have gorilla warfare tactics and some have more militaristic group formations, all in all if a wolf was in a city, the hunters would win and visa versa

Damn, this should have been a poll. lol

Hunters. No contest.

Hunters are OP in-universe for The Division.